From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tahiti Bar v. Penn. Liquor Con. Bd.

U.S.
Nov 9, 1959
361 U.S. 85 (1959)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 363.

Decided November 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 395 Pa. 355, 150 A.2d 112.

Edwin P. Rome for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell C. Wismer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Summaries of

Tahiti Bar v. Penn. Liquor Con. Bd.

U.S.
Nov 9, 1959
361 U.S. 85 (1959)
Case details for

Tahiti Bar v. Penn. Liquor Con. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:TAHITI BAR, INC., v . PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 9, 1959

Citations

361 U.S. 85 (1959)

Citing Cases

Down Under v. Alcoholic Beverage Control

Accordingly, the standards of vagueness and indefiniteness applicable to criminal statutes are not applicable…

Aristocratic Restaurant v. Alco. Bev. Control Comm'n

See Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50, 63 n. 18 (1976). See also Tahiti Bar, Inc. Liquor…