From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tagle v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 16, 2016
2:15-cv-00623-APG-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2016)

Opinion

2:15-cv-00623-APG-GWF

03-16-2016

VICTOR TAGLE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On May 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to issue summonses. (ECF No. 43). The Court denies the motion. Plaintiff's Supplemental Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 86) is in line for screening. If any of Plaintiff's claims survive screening, the Court will serve Defendants when it is procedurally applicable to do so.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to issue summonses (ECF No. 43) is denied.

DATED: This 16th day of March, 2016.

/s/_________

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Tagle v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 16, 2016
2:15-cv-00623-APG-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Tagle v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR TAGLE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 16, 2016

Citations

2:15-cv-00623-APG-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2016)