From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tagle v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 19, 2020
457 P.3d 248 (Nev. 2020)

Opinion

No. 80551

02-19-2020

Victor TAGLE, Sr., Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent.

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks dismissal of charges he claims were "made under false arrest."

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Tagle v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 19, 2020
457 P.3d 248 (Nev. 2020)
Case details for

Tagle v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR TAGLE, SR., Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

457 P.3d 248 (Nev. 2020)