From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tagle v. Bank of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 19, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00204-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-cv-00204-RFB-BNW

03-19-2020

VICTOR TAGLE, SR., Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 18, 2020, the court entered an order requiring plaintiff Victor Tagle, Sr. to update his address so the court can communicate with him about his case, and he has not done so. (See Order (ECF No. 6).) The court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the court's order would result in a recommendation that his case be dismissed under Local Rule IA 3-1. Plaintiff has not complied with the court's order, requested an extension of time to do so, or taken any other action in the case. He therefore appears to have abandoned this case.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Victor Tagle, Sr.'s case be dismissed without prejudice.

NOTICE

This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 19, 2020

/s/_________

BRENDA WEKSLER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Tagle v. Bank of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 19, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00204-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Tagle v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR TAGLE, SR., Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 19, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:20-cv-00204-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2020)