From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taft v. Nabisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2015
Case No.: CV15-2685 DSF (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: CV15-2685 DSF (MRWx)

08-05-2015

FOSTER TAFT, Plaintiff, v. NABISCO; NABISCO, INC; MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL; MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC; REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC; PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC; PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC; ALTRIA GROUP, INC; KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC; GENERAL MILLS; GENERAL MILLS, INC; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Plaintiff having voluntarily dismissed without prejudice Defendants Philip Morris International, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Reynolds American Inc., and Altria Group, Inc., and the Court having dismissed with prejudice all claims against Nabisco, Nabisco, Inc., Mondelez International, Mondelez International, Inc., Kraft Foods Group, Inc., General Mills, and General Mills, Inc. (Prevailing Defendants).

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice, and that Prevailing Defendants recover their costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

All claims against any remaining DOE Defendants are dismissed. Dated: 8/5/15

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Taft v. Nabisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2015
Case No.: CV15-2685 DSF (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Taft v. Nabisco

Case Details

Full title:FOSTER TAFT, Plaintiff, v. NABISCO; NABISCO, INC; MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 5, 2015

Citations

Case No.: CV15-2685 DSF (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2015)