From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tacoma v. Boyd

The Supreme Court of Washington
May 24, 1937
68 P.2d 1030 (Wash. 1937)

Opinion

No. 26523. Department One.

May 24, 1937.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Remann, J., entered October 22, 1936, upon a trial and conviction of obstructing a public thoroughfare. Affirmed.

P.L. Pendleton, for appellant.

Howard Carothers, Bartlett Rummel, and George F. Abel, for respondent.


Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P.2d 1028. It is suggested in the briefs that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The evidence, in our opinion, was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that all the elements of the offense defined by the ordinance were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Tacoma v. Boyd

The Supreme Court of Washington
May 24, 1937
68 P.2d 1030 (Wash. 1937)
Case details for

Tacoma v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. SIEBERT BOYD, Appellant

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: May 24, 1937

Citations

68 P.2d 1030 (Wash. 1937)
190 Wash. 710
190 Wn. 710