From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tackett v. Mayo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 30, 1925
276 S.W. 974 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925)

Opinion

Decided October 30, 1925.

Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.

JOSEPH D. HARKINS, JOHN CAUDILL, S.C. FERGUSON and JOHN D. CARROLL for appellant.

EDWARD L. ALLEN, A.J. MAY, C.B. WHEELER, JOE HOBSON, B.M. JAMES and O'REAR, FOWLER WALLACE for appellee.


Reversing.

Appellant and appellee were rival candidates for the Democratic nomination for county attorney of Floyd county, Ky., at the late primary election. Appellee was awarded the certificate of nomination. Appellant contested. The circuit court dismissed the contest and declared appellee nominated, hence this appeal.

From the evidence it appears that both of them through their friends and with their knowledge and consent, were guilty of violations of the Corrupt Practice Act. It follows, then, that neither appellant nor appellee may be declared to have been nominated the candidate aforesaid at the primary.

Hence the judgment herein is reversed and this cause remanded, with directions that a judgment be entered herein in conformity with this opinion and that each party be required to pay his own costs.

Whole court sitting.


Summaries of

Tackett v. Mayo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 30, 1925
276 S.W. 974 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925)
Case details for

Tackett v. Mayo

Case Details

Full title:Tackett v. Mayo

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Oct 30, 1925

Citations

276 S.W. 974 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925)
276 S.W. 974

Citing Cases

Walker v. Taylor

Ky. Stats. 1565b11. The statute confers the nomination on the candidate who is a party to the contest and did…

Kluemper v. Zimmer

Dietz v. Zimmer, 231 Ky. 546, 21 S.W.2d 999. But the question is presented by a contest, and, if Zimmer and…