From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taborn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 27, 2018
543 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80540

03-27-2018

Anthony TABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Steven B. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Steven B. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, Presiding, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Anthony L. Taborn appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and argues that it was error to deny his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective when she failed to raise a claim of error on direct appeal involving the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence at trial. Because appellate counsel's strategic decision not to raise this issue on direct appeal was reasonable, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Taborn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 27, 2018
543 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Taborn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony TABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 27, 2018

Citations

543 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)