From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tabor v. Burnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1924
125 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1924)

Opinion

(Filed 19 December, 1924.)

APPEAL by plaintiffs from McElroy, J., at April Term, 1924, of MACON.

T. J. Johnson and A. W. Horn for plaintiffs.

Ray Ray and R. D. Sisk for defendants.


Civil action in ejectment and to recover damages for wrongful possession.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.


Plaintiffs in limine lodge a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. It is alleged that the information, which plaintiffs consider vital and important to their cause, came to their attention after the adjournment of the term of court at which the case was tried, and after the appeal was docketed here. Allen v. Gooding, 174 N.C. 271. The showing made by plaintiffs in this respect seems to meet the requirements laid down in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N.C. p. 453, for the granting of new trials upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. Upon this ground, the cause will be remanded for another hearing.

New trial.


Summaries of

Tabor v. Burnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1924
125 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1924)
Case details for

Tabor v. Burnett

Case Details

Full title:H. H. TABOR ET AL. v. W. A. BURNETT ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1924

Citations

125 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1924)
125 S.E. 927

Citing Cases

Allen v. Gooding

Affirmed. Cited: S. v. Hartsfield, 188 N.C. 358; Manuel v. R. R., 188 N.C. 560; Tabor v. Burnett, 188 N.C.…