From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tabin v. Miller

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 16, 2008
No. 07-13836 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 16, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-13836.

December 16, 2008


ORDER


Defendants have filed a motion to compel discovery [Docket #20], based on Plaintiff's failure to respond timely to interrogatories and requests to produce. Plaintiff has not filed a response to this motion.

Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(3), Defendants are entitled to an order compelling Plaintiff to produce the requested discovery. However, on December 12, 2008, I issued a Report and Recommendation (R R), recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted, and the case dismissed. If that R R is adopted by the District Judge, then the present motion to compel will be moot. On the other hand, if Plaintiff ultimately survives summary judgment, he is required to respond to the interrogatories and requests to produce.

Accordingly, Defendants' motion to compel [Docket #20] is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. If and only if the District Judge rejects the R R, the Plaintiff shall produce the requested discovery within 14 days of entry of the final order denying summary judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tabin v. Miller

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 16, 2008
No. 07-13836 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Tabin v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN E. TABIN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER RYAN E. MILLER, in his individual…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

No. 07-13836 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 16, 2008)