From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tabarez v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2011
No. 2:04-cv-0360 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-0360 LKK KJN P.

September 16, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendant Max Lemon filed a reply to plaintiff's objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 8, 2011, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's August 24, 2010 motion to rescind the settlement agreement is denied; and

3. Defendants' September 2, 2010 motion to enforce the settlement agreement is granted.


Summaries of

Tabarez v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2011
No. 2:04-cv-0360 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Tabarez v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY TABAREZ, Plaintiff, v. DIANA BUTLER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-0360 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)