Opinion
2:19-cv-01816-ART-DJA
08-22-2022
T1 PAYMENTS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. NEW U LIFE CORPORATION, a California corporation, Defendant. NEW U LIFE CORPORATION, a California corporation, Counterclaimant, v. T1 PAYMENTS LLC, et al., Counterclaim-Defendants.
VENABLE LLP, ARI N. ROTHMAN (pro hac vice), P. RANDY SEYBOLD (pro hac vice), JANE B. BABER (pro hac vice), Aaron D. Shipley, Tara U. Teegarden, McDONALD CARANO LLP Attorneys for Pixxles Ltd. BROWN BROWN & PREMSRIRUT, Puoy K. Premsrirut, ROME & ASSOCIATES, A.P.C., Brianna Dahlberg (pro hac vice), Eugene Rome (pro hac vice), Attorneys for New U Life Corporation
VENABLE LLP, ARI N. ROTHMAN (pro hac vice), P. RANDY SEYBOLD (pro hac vice), JANE B. BABER (pro hac vice), Aaron D. Shipley, Tara U. Teegarden, McDONALD CARANO LLP Attorneys for Pixxles Ltd.
BROWN BROWN & PREMSRIRUT, Puoy K. Premsrirut, ROME & ASSOCIATES, A.P.C., Brianna Dahlberg (pro hac vice), Eugene Rome (pro hac vice), Attorneys for New U Life Corporation
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PIXXLES LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS NEW U LIFE CORP.'S SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM [ECF NO. 266] (FIRST REQUEST)
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Specially-appearing counterclaim-defendant Pixxles Ltd. and counterclaimant New U Life stipulate to permit Pixxles Ltd. to file its reply in support of its pending motion to dismiss on or before August 31, 2022. Pixxles Ltd. submits that good cause exists to grant the extension sought by this stipulation for the reasons set forth below.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On August 1, 2022, Pixxles Ltd. filed a timely motion to dismiss New U Life's Second Amended Counterclaim (ECF No. 215, “SACC”) for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 266.) New U Life filed its opposition to Pixxles Ltd.'s motion to dismiss on August 15, 2022. (ECF No. 270.) Pursuant to LR 7-2(b), the deadline for Pixxles Ltd. to file a reply in support of its motion to dismiss is August 22, 2022. Pixxles Ltd. and New U Life stipulate to extend that response to date to and through August 31, 2022.
II. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Pixxles Ltd. submits that good cause exists to grant a modest extension for Pixxles Ltd. to reply to New U Life's opposition to Pixxles Ltd.'s motion to dismiss from August 22, 2022, to August 31, 2022. This is the first stipulation for extension of time related to this motion. Pixxles Ltd. represents that its lawyers will be traveling over the next two weeks and must also attend to the press of other business.
Pixxles Ltd. submits that its request is not made for the purposes of delay, but rather is in the best interest of the parties and judicial efficiency. In so stipulating, Pixxles Ltd. is not consenting to the personal jurisdiction of this Court or otherwise waiving any rights or defenses.
Accordingly, Pixxles Ltd. requests that the Court modify Pixxles Ltd.'s briefing schedule and permit Pixxles Ltd. to file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss on or before August 31, 2022. New U Life has consented to this extension. 1
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2