Syntest Techs., Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

Full title: SYNTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

607 F. App'x 996 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1569

06-15-2015

SYNTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee

JOHN J. SHAEFFER, Fox Rothschild, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY H. GRANT; GREGORY P. CASIMER, Lathrop & Gage LLP, Chicago, IL. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JASON M. WILCOX; DOUGLAS M. KUBEHL, SAMARA KLINE, Baker Botts LLP, Dallas TX.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:12-cv-05965-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal.

JUDGMENT

JOHN J. SHAEFFER, Fox Rothschild, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY H. GRANT; GREGORY P. CASIMER, Lathrop & Gage LLP, Chicago, IL. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JASON M. WILCOX; DOUGLAS M. KUBEHL, SAMARA KLINE, Baker Botts LLP, Dallas TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 15, 2015
Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court