From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Synqor v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Feb 1, 2011
410 F. App'x 321 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 2011-1191, 2011-1192, 2011-1193, 2011-1194.

February 1, 2011.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in case no. 07-CV-0497, Judge T. John Ward.

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Washington, DC, Robert J. McAughan Jr., Jeffrey A. Andrews, Locke, Lord Bissell Liddell, LLP, Houston, TX, Erik R. Puknys, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Palo Alto, CA, Steven N. Williams, Kennedy, Clark Williams, P.C., Dallas, TX, Avin Sharma, Vasquez Benisek Lindgren, LLP, Lafayette, CA, Alan D. Smith, Fish Richardson, P.C., Boston, MA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Constantine L. Trela Jr., Thomas D. Rein, Robert N. Hochman, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, Michael D. Hatcher, Sidley Austin LLP, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before LINN, Circuit Judge.


ON MOTION ORDER

Bel Fuse submits a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

SynQor, Inc. is directed to respond no later than February 7, 2011. The injunction is temporarily stayed to the extent that it applies to products specified on page 13 of Bel Fuse's motion that Bel Fuse asserts are sold to Cisco Systems, Inc., pending this court's consideration of the papers submitted.


Summaries of

Synqor v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Feb 1, 2011
410 F. App'x 321 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Synqor v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc

Case Details

Full title:SYNQOR, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ASTEC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 1, 2011

Citations

410 F. App'x 321 (Fed. Cir. 2011)