Opinion
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC
03-12-2013
SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, Defendant.
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE WILLIAM H. WRIGHT VICKIE L. FEEMAN Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP DOUGLAS E. LUMISH JEFFREY G. HOMRIG GABRIEL S. GROSS JOSEPH H. LEE Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP M. PATRICIA THAYER PHILIP W. WOO Sidley Austin LLP By: William H. Wright Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. GEORGE A. RILEY MARK E. MILLER MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW ELIZABETH OFFEN-BROWN O'Melveny & Meyers, LLP By: Mark E. Miller Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION William H. Wright Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
X Private ADR (please identify process and provider). Mediation before JAMS mediator Hon. Edward A. Infante (Ret.) was conducted on January 21, 2013. The parties agree to continue the discussions started with Judge Infante.
[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
X other requested deadline. The parties conducted mediation on January 21, 2013.
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE
WILLIAM H. WRIGHT
VICKIE L. FEEMAN
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP
DOUGLAS E. LUMISH
JEFFREY G. HOMRIG
GABRIEL S. GROSS
JOSEPH H. LEE
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres &
Friedman, LLP
M. PATRICIA THAYER
PHILIP W. WOO
Sidley Austin LLP
By: William H. Wright
Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC.
GEORGE A. RILEY
MARK E. MILLER
MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW
ELIZABETH OFFEN-BROWN
O'Melveny & Meyers, LLP
By: Mark E. Miller
Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS
CORPORATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for SYNOPSYS, INC. has obtained the concurrence of MENTOR GRAPHICS counsel in the filing of this Stipulation.
By: __________________
William H. Wright
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[x] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
[ ] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________
HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States Senior District Judge
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."