From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 12, 2023
2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF

10-12-2023

SEBASTIAN SYMEONIDES, an Individual, Plaintiff, v. TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company d/b/a TRUMP INTERNATIONAL LAS VEGAS and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER LAS VEGAS; TRUMP RUFFIN TOWER I, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTELS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; OTIS ELEVATOR CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through XX, inclusive, Defendants.

CHRISTIANSEN TRIAL LAWYERS R. TODD TERRY, ESQ. KEELY P. CHIPPOLETTI, ESQ. JAY TRONFELD, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) TRONFELD WEST & DURRETT Attorneys for Plaintiff LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP JOSH COLE AICKLEN, ESQ. DAVID B. AVAKIAN, ESQ. YILMAZ E. TURKERI, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant Trump Ruffin Tower I, Trump International Las Vegas and Trump International Hotel & Tower Las Vegas and Trump International Hotels Management, LLC ROGERS, MASTRANGELO, CARVALHO & MITCHELL REBECCA L. MASTRANGELO, ESQ. VASUDHSIRI T. SATHIENMARS, ESQ. California Bar No. 282619 (admitted pro hac vice) TUCKER ELLIS LLP SU-LYN COMBS, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) TUCKER ELLIS LLP Attorneys for Defendant Otis Elevator Company


CHRISTIANSEN TRIAL LAWYERS R. TODD TERRY, ESQ. KEELY P. CHIPPOLETTI, ESQ. JAY TRONFELD, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) TRONFELD WEST & DURRETT Attorneys for Plaintiff

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP JOSH COLE AICKLEN, ESQ. DAVID B. AVAKIAN, ESQ. YILMAZ E. TURKERI, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant Trump Ruffin Tower I, Trump International Las Vegas and Trump International Hotel & Tower Las Vegas and Trump International Hotels Management, LLC

ROGERS, MASTRANGELO, CARVALHO & MITCHELL REBECCA L. MASTRANGELO, ESQ. VASUDHSIRI T. SATHIENMARS, ESQ. California Bar No. 282619 (admitted pro hac vice) TUCKER ELLIS LLP SU-LYN COMBS, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) TUCKER ELLIS LLP Attorneys for Defendant Otis Elevator Company

CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

Certain parties believe that discovery will encompass documents and information that would not ordinarily be disclosed to the public and that disclosure or misuse of such materials would cause competitive harm, raise privacy concerns, and violate confidentiality provisions set forth in various, current contracts binding on the parties. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to the entry of this Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order (“Agreed Order”) to expedite the flow of discovery materials, preserve the integrity of information that one or more parties believe is confidential, promote the prompt resolution of discovery disputes over confidentiality, facilitate the preservation of materials that may contain confidential information and trade secrets, and prevent breach of the confidential provisions set forth in contracts. For purposes of this Agreed Order, “Confidential Information” shall mean documents or other materials that one or more parties believe to include proprietary information relating to their business or personal financial information, disclosure of which might be harmful. Documents or information designated by one or more parties as “Confidential Information” pursuant to this Agreed Order governing discovery shall be without prejudice to any party's claim, defense or contention, whether relating to discovery issues in this lawsuit or to substantive issues in this or any other lawsuit, that such documents or information do not in fact constitute trade secrets or confidential information.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Confidential Information" does not include information which (a) is in or becomes a part of the public domain without violation of this Agreed Order by any party to this litigation or their counsel; (b) is customarily provided by any party to this litigation to third parties without restriction on disclosure; (c) was known to a party to this litigation on a non-confidential basis prior to its disclosure to such party or their counsel in this litigation; or (d) is not otherwise subject to a restriction on disclosure and is rightfully obtained by any party or their counsel from a source other than a party in this litigation.

Accordingly, in the interests of justice and to expedite discovery, the parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE that:

1. Confidential Information: To protect trade secrets, personal financial information, or other confidential research, development, or commercial information, any party or third party may designate documents, information, or testimony as Confidential Information under this Order as follows:

The designation shall be made by clearly stamping or marking any document, including any interrogatory answer or transcript, with the word “CONFIDENTIAL.” Transcripts (or portions thereof) may be designated "CONFIDENTIAL" or "ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" (described in paragraphs 3 and 4 below) by instructing the reporter to stamp or mark the transcript (or portions thereof) within ten (10) days after it is received, and shall be treated as Attorneys' Eyes Only Information until the ten (10) day designation period has passed.

In the case of electronically-stored information, a party producing Confidential Information in an electronically-stored format shall stamp the physical medium by which the information is transmitted (e.g. computer tape, computer disk, CD Rom, etc.) as “CONFIDENTIAL.” If the party to whom such electronically-stored information is produced shall create any readable report or output from such confidential data, that party shall prominently label each page of such output report as “CONFIDENTIAL.”

A party, provider of documents or non-party witness may denominate any response to any written discovery request brief, motion or other material filed with the court, and any appendix, exhibit or document pertaining to such material as Confidential Information by stamping the cover or first page, “CONFIDENTIAL.”

Documents produced, or to be produced, by a third-party, including but not limited to personal financial bank records, tax records, or other private documents or information, may be designated as confidential prior to their release through subpoena via a written notice to all parties.

2. Limited Disclosure and Use of Confidential Information : A person who received Confidential Information (hereinafter, “receiving person”) has a duty to preserve confidentiality, shall not make any further disclosure of it except as authorized below or by further order, and shall use it only for purposes of this case or any arbitration or mediation related to this case. A receiving person shall execute the Non-Disclosure Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A as a required condition precedent of receiving any Confidential Information when requested to do so by a party to the above-captioned litigation or their counsel, where said party originally created and/or possesses or controls the Confidential Information. A receiving person is defined by this Agreed Order to refer to one of to the following persons:

A. Attorneys of record for the parties of this litigation;
B. Designated business persons from each of the corporate parties (“Corporate Designees”) but only to the extent necessary for the conduct of this action; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met;
C. Deposition reporters;
D. Independent experts, investigators, and other consultants retained by counsel; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met;
E. Associates, secretaries, paralegals, clerical and other employees of the individuals identified in subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) above, to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in the litigation;
F. A deponent during the course of his or her deposition;
G. Any person who is referenced in Confidential Information; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met;
H. Witnesses or prospective witnesses in the course of investigation or in preparation for deposition, or at deposition; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met; and
I. The Court, any arbitrator, mediator or adjudicator and their personnel.

3. Attorneys' Eyes Only Information : A producing party may designate Confidential Information as “Attorneys' Eyes Only” if the party makes a good faith determination that the information threatens significant competitive harm if revealed to an opposing party or other competitor. The designation shall be made in a manner similar to that provided in paragraph 1, using the words “ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY.”

4. Further Limitations on Disclosure and Use of Attorneys Eyes Only : Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall be treated in all respects as "Confidential Information" under this Protective Order. In addition to the protections already contained herein, Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall be subject to the following additional restrictions:

Attorneys' Eyes Only information shall only be disclosed to those persons listed in paragraph 2(a), (c), (d) - (f) and (i) hereof;

Authorized counsel may not communicate or transmit any Attorneys' Eyes Only Information, or the contents of those materials, to any employee, director, agent and/or representative of the parties in this action, including in-house counsel of any corporate party; and

If Attorneys' Eyes Only Information is used during a deposition, the party introducing the Attorneys' Eyes Only Information topic shall announce that such a topic or document will be the subject of questions. All persons not allowed to view or receive such information shall leave the deposition at that time. The transcript of any questioning regarding Attorneys' Eyes Only Information topics shall be kept separately from the main transcript of the deposition and shall be stamped or marked “ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY INFORMATION."

Any breach of this provision shall entitle the party whose Attorneys' Eyes Only Information was disclosed to seek immediate equitable relief in this Court, in addition to such other sanctions and remedies as may be appropriate.

The protection afforded by this paragraph to Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall be preserved at all pre-trial hearings of this matter, and until further modified by the Court.

5. Submission to Court : No Confidential Information, whether embodied in physical objects, documents, electronically-stored data, tangible items or the transcription of statements of persons, shall be publicly filed with the Court, unless the producing party consents in writing to such filing, or unless filed in a sealed envelope on which shall be endorsed the caption of the action and a statement substantially in the following form:

CONFIDENTIAL

This envelope contains documents or information in this case that is subject to a Confidentiality Order entered by the Court. This envelope shall not be opened nor the contents thereof displayed or revealed except by Order of Court. Violation thereof may be regarded as contempt of court.

A party discharges its obligations under this paragraph by filing a pleading, motion, brief or other papers in two parts and placing the part which contains Confidential Information under seal (will do so by Motion under FRCP 26(c) and Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006)). Any courtesy copy delivered to the Court shall be marked: "Courtesy Copy - Original Under Seal." Similar procedures shall be followed with regard to Attorneys Eyes Only Information.

If any party believes that a designation as Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information as to any document, material or information by any other party or by any witness is unwarranted, it may so inform the designating party or witness in writing (a “written objection”). Upon receipt by the designating party of such written objection, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to resolve their differences. If, within ten (10) days after such written objection to a designation the parties have failed to reach an agreement, the designating party may apply to the Court for a ruling that the designation as to any document, material or information shall be treated as designated, giving notice to the party or non-party producing the documents. No disclosure of any documents, material or information designated as Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall be made, except in accordance herewith, by the recipient prior to decision by the Court on any such motion; if no such motion is filed within thirty (30) days after such written objection, the Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only designation shall be deemed withdrawn. In any proceeding challenging the propriety of the designation of any document, information or materials as Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information, the party, provider of documents or witness who has designated the document, material or information as Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall bear the burden of establishing the propriety of that designation. Until the Court enters an Order changing the designation for any document, material or information, it shall be given “Confidential" or "Attorneys' Eyes Only" (however designated) treatment in accordance with this Order.

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed, neither the termination of this lawsuit nor the termination of employment of any person who has had access to any Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall relieve such person from the terms of this Order. This Order shall not be deemed a waiver of:

A. Any party's right to object to any discovery requests on any ground or to seek a protective order with respect to any such discovery request;
B. Any party's right to seek an order compelling discovery with respect to any discovery request;
C. Any party's right to object to the admission of any evidence on any ground;
D. Any party's right to seek a modification of this Order upon reasonable notice to all other parties; or
E. Any party's right to challenge the propriety of the designation of any material as Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information at any time. Failure of any party to promptly challenge the propriety of such a designation shall not preclude that party's subsequent objection to such designation, a motion by that party to seek a determination as to the propriety of such designation or a motion by that party to otherwise modify the provisions this Order. The designation by a party that material is Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only shall not constitute an admission by any other party that the material is confidential.

6. All Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information shall be returned as follows :

Within thirty (30) days after the final determination of this Action, or sooner if agreed to in writing by the parties, all Confidential and Attorneys' Eyes Only Information, including originals, and subject to subparagraph (c) hereof, copies, abstracts or summaries thereof, shall be returned to the attorney for the party producing and providing the material or destroyed by the party receiving such material, and no copies thereof shall be retained by any other person; provided, however, that counsel of record for the parties may keep, in strictest confidence, one copy of any part of the Confidential and Attorneys' Eyes Only Information produced by others. Such copy shall remain subject to the terms of this Order.

If Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information is furnished to a testifying or consulting expert, investigator, other consultant, or witness, the attorney for the party using such expert, investigator, other consultant, or witness shall have the responsibility of ensuring that all such material, including copies, abstracts and summaries thereof, is returned to the party producing the same or destroyed.

Counsel of record for each party may retain abstracts or summaries of materials, which contain counsel's mental impressions or opinions. Such abstracts or summaries, which contain or refer to Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information, shall, however, remain subject to the terms of this Order.

The parties will cooperate to establish a procedure for the use of information that has been designated Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only at trial or during any court hearing. At a minimum, that procedure should mandate that all information which has been designated Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only is submitted under seal (will do so by FRCP 26(c) and Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006)), and that only the persons set forth in paragraph 2 can be present in the courtroom when any information that has been designated Confidential, or set forth in paragraph 4 can be present in the courtroom when any information that has been designated Attorneys' Eyes Only, is referenced.

If a party to this Stipulation and Order misuses or improperly discloses Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information in violation of this Order, the designating party may seek appropriate sanctions. The party who claims that a violation of this Order has occurred shall have the burden of proof on that issue.

Each party will endeavor to make reasonable efforts to ensure that materials and documents that should bear the Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only legend are so labeled in fact. A failure to so designate any document or material shall not be deemed a waiver of the confidentiality protection. In the event a party belatedly determines that any document or material should be designated as confidential under this Stipulation and Order, such party will so, notify the other party and the other party agrees to accept that notification and arrange to comply with the remaining provision of this Stipulation and Order to such late designated documents and materials.

Any party, persons, and entities obtaining access to Confidential and/or Attorneys' Eyes Only Information under this Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order, shall use the information only for preparation and trial of the above-captioned litigation (including appeals and retrials thereof), and shall absolutely not use such information for any other purpose whatsoever, including business, governmental, commercial, or administrative or judicial proceedings.

Each party agrees to be bound by the terms of this Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order as of the date it is executed, prior to the entry of the Order by the Court. This Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one instrument.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 12, 2023
2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC

Case Details

Full title:SEBASTIAN SYMEONIDES, an Individual, Plaintiff, v. TRUMP RUFFIN…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2023)