From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Symantec Corp. v. Johns Creek Software, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 12, 2011
CASE NO. 11-cv-03146-WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-cv-03146-WHA

10-12-2011

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOHNS CREEK SOFTWARE, INC., a Georgia Corporation, STEPHEN CHEATHAM, an individual, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Jennifer L. Barry Attorneys for Plaintiff SYMANTEC CORPORATION RODENBAUGH LAW Michael L. Rodenbaugh Attorneys for Defendants JOHNS CREEK SOFTWARE, INC. AND STEPHEN CHEATHAM


LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Perry J. Viscounty (Bar No. 132143)

perry.viscounty@lw.com

650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor

Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925

Telephone: (714) 540-1235

Facsimile: (714) 755-8290

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Jennifer L. Barry (Bar No. 228066)

jennifer.barry@lw.com

600 West Broadway, Suite 1800

San Diego, California 92101-3375

Telephone: (619) 236-1234

Facsimile: (619) 696-7419

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYMANTEC CORPORATION

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

EXTENDING DATE TO RESPOND TO

COUNTER-COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Symantec Corporation ("Plaintiff") and defendants Johns Creek Software, Inc. and Stephen Cheatham ("Defendants") stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed its Complaint on June 24, 2011.

2. After the Court denied their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction on September 12, 2011, Defendants filed an Answer and Counter-Complaint on September 22, 2011.

3. Symantec's response to the Counter-Complaint is currently due on October 17, 2011.

4. Based on meet-and-confer discussions between the parties, Defendants intend to amend their Counter-Complaint on or before October 24, 2011.

5. The parties accordingly stipulate and request that Plaintiff's time to respond to the Counter-Complaint be extended to 24 days after the filing and service of Defendants' Amended Counter-Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: Jennifer L. Barry

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYMANTEC CORPORATION

RODENBAUGH LAW

By: Michael L. Rodenbaugh

Attorneys for Defendants

JOHNS CREEK SOFTWARE, INC.

AND STEPHEN CHEATHAM

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

U.S. District Court Judge

ATTESTATION: I certify that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from all parties whose electronic signatures appear above.

Jennifer L. Barry


Summaries of

Symantec Corp. v. Johns Creek Software, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 12, 2011
CASE NO. 11-cv-03146-WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Symantec Corp. v. Johns Creek Software, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOHNS CREEK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 11-cv-03146-WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)