From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sykes v. Sykes

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 924 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Submitted May 28th, 1927.

Decided October 17th, 1927.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Berry.

Messrs. O'Brien Tartalsky ( Samuel Tartalsky, of counsel), for the appellant.

Mr. Howard Ewart, for the respondent.


We are of the opinion that the decree under review was quite justified by the evidence. We think that the evidence (which we have examined with care) established willful, continued and obstinate desertion upon the part of the defendant husband for the term of two years.

The decree will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Sykes v. Sykes

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 924 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Sykes v. Sykes

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINE ADA SYKES, petitioner-respondent, v. LUTHER HARRISON SYKES…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1927

Citations

138 A. 924 (N.J. 1927)
138 A. 924