From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sydnor v. Kuplinski

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7694.

Submitted: February 21, 2008.

Decided: February 27, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00697).

Dwayne E. Sydnor, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Dwayne E. Sydnor seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Dir., Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court's order was entered on the docket on August 3, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on November 4, 2007. Because Sydnor failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Sydnor's motion for seizure of medical records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the earliest date it could have been properly the date appearing on the notice of appeal is delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed.R.App.P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245(1988).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Sydnor v. Kuplinski

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Sydnor v. Kuplinski

Case Details

Full title:Dwayne E. SYDNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John R. KUPLINSKI, Jail…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)