From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sydney v. Pacific Indem. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1897 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1897

08-01-2012

A. DAVID SYDNEY and PATRICIA SYDNEY v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY


ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Pacific Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment of April 16, 2012, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or Rule 56 (paper no. 3), and the replies and responses thereto (papers no. 6, 11, 13), the court ruling on the matter as a Motion to Dismiss, for the reasons in the attached memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

The Pacific Motion to Dismiss (paper no. 3) is GRANTED.

Norma L. Shapiro

J.


Summaries of

Sydney v. Pacific Indem. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1897 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Sydney v. Pacific Indem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:A. DAVID SYDNEY and PATRICIA SYDNEY v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1897 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)

Citing Cases

Fla. Ins. Guaranty Ass'n v. Branco

Williamson v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., No. 11–cv–6476, 2012 WL 760838, at *4 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 8, 2012) ; see also…

Fla. Ins. Guaranty Ass'n v. Branco

Williamson v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., No. 11–cv–6476, 2012 WL 760838, at *4 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 8, 2012); see also…