Opinion
1:21CV585
05-11-2022
ORDER
N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
On April 14, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Docs. #20, 21]. On April 29, 2022, Plaintiffs filed untimely objections. [Doc. #22.] See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2) (“Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file . . . objections.”).
Despite the untimeliness, the Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. #14] is DENIED.