From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Switzer v. Tyson Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
May 11, 2022
1:21CV585 (M.D.N.C. May. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV585

05-11-2022

ADRIAN SWITZER and MICHELLE SWITZER, Plaintiffs, v. TYSON FARMS, INC. Defendant.


ORDER

N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

On April 14, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Docs. #20, 21]. On April 29, 2022, Plaintiffs filed untimely objections. [Doc. #22.] See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2) (“Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file . . . objections.”).

Despite the untimeliness, the Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. #14] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Switzer v. Tyson Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
May 11, 2022
1:21CV585 (M.D.N.C. May. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Switzer v. Tyson Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN SWITZER and MICHELLE SWITZER, Plaintiffs, v. TYSON FARMS, INC…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: May 11, 2022

Citations

1:21CV585 (M.D.N.C. May. 11, 2022)