From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swinton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 7, 2022
645 S.W.3d 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84239

06-07-2022

Fazon SWINTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Annette M. Wallace, Kansas City, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for respondent.


Annette M. Wallace, Kansas City, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Fazon Swinton was convicted of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, attempted robbery in the second-degree, and leaving the scene of a shooting. Swinton asserted that he acted in self-defense. He did not testify at his trial. Following the affirmance of his convictions on direct appeal, Swinton filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentiary hearing. Swinton appeals. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to strike a venireperson for cause, after that venireperson indicated his desire to hear testimony from the defendant where the defendant asserted self-defense. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Swinton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 7, 2022
645 S.W.3d 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Swinton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Fazon SWINTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

645 S.W.3d 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)