Swims v. State

Full title: KEYRAN SWIMS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 2, 2000

16 S.W.3d 746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76755

May 2, 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Honorable Evelyn M. Baker, Judge.

Nancy L. Vincent, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris III, Atty. Gen., Karen Pope Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keyran Swims (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing ordered by remand inState v. Swims, 966 S.W.2d 368 (Mo.App.E.D. 1998). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j) (1995). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).