From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swilley v. Higgason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-230-CWR-RHW (S.D. Miss. Jun. 19, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-230-CWR-RHW

06-19-2017

JAMES ANTHONY SWILLEY PETITIONER v. WARDEN NEAL HIGGASON RESPONDENT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R), Docket No. 20, and petitioner James Anthony Swilley's objection to that R&R, Docket No. 22. Swilley's objection re-urges his arguments that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and due process of law in Mississippi state court criminal proceedings.

Having reviewed the R&R, Swilley's objection, and the relevant portions of the record, this Court is unpersuaded that Swilley has met the high standard necessary to obtain habeas relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The R&R is therefore adopted as the Court's own Order and this case is dismissed. No certificate of appealability shall issue.

SO ORDERED, this the 19th day of June, 2017.

s/ Carlton W. Reeves

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Swilley v. Higgason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-230-CWR-RHW (S.D. Miss. Jun. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Swilley v. Higgason

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANTHONY SWILLEY PETITIONER v. WARDEN NEAL HIGGASON RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 19, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-230-CWR-RHW (S.D. Miss. Jun. 19, 2017)