From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swensen v. Corniola

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2015
No. 62007 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2015)

Opinion

No. 62007

02-13-2015

RASHELLE SWENSEN, Appellant, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY CORNIOLA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

In her response to this court's order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and concurrent motion to voluntarily dismiss, appellant concedes that no final judgment has been entered below. Thus, as we lack jurisdiction, NRAP 3A(b)(1), we grant the motion, with the parties to bear their own fees and costs, NRAP 42(b), and

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Nothing in this order precludes appellant from filing a new notice of appeal from the district court's final judgment.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge

Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge

The Wasielewski Law Firm, Ltd.

Premier Legal Group

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Swensen v. Corniola

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2015
No. 62007 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Swensen v. Corniola

Case Details

Full title:RASHELLE SWENSEN, Appellant, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY CORNIOLA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 13, 2015

Citations

No. 62007 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2015)