From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweezy v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

April, 1916.


The contract contemplated that plaintiff should sink the well until gravel-bearing fresh water was reached. It conclusively appears that he failed to perform his contract in this respect. Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Sweezy v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Sweezy v. O'Rourke

Case Details

Full title:William H. Sweezy, Respondent, v. Joanna M. O'Rourke, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)