From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeting v. Stanford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2013
517 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7791

04-03-2013

KENNETH SWEETING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. STANFORD, Head Nurse; DR. REPKO, Optometrist (eye doctor); DR. THOMPSON, Head Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.

Kenneth Sweeting, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00334-NKM-RSB) Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Sweeting, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM

Kenneth Sweeting appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sweeting's motions to appoint counsel and to compel return of legal materials and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweeting v. M. Stanford, No. 7:11-cv-00334-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sweeting v. Stanford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2013
517 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Sweeting v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SWEETING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. STANFORD, Head Nurse; DR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

517 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2013)