From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeting v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 19, 2017
2016-2540 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2540

07-19-2017

ARTHUR SWEETING, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by ERIC SHUMSKY; ANJALI DALAL, New York, NY. KATRINA LEDERER, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK, KATHERINE M. SMITH.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT-315H-16-0389-I-1.

JUDGMENT

MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by ERIC SHUMSKY; ANJALI DALAL, New York, NY. KATRINA LEDERER, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK, KATHERINE M. SMITH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 19, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Sweeting v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 19, 2017
2016-2540 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Sweeting v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR SWEETING, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 2017

Citations

2016-2540 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2017)