From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeters v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1998
256 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


A guarantor is liable to the creditor only for the amount of the principal obligor's default ( see, GE Capital Mtge. Servs. v. Pinnacle Mtge. Inv. Corp., 897 F Supp 842, 848, n 3). Accordingly, because the principal obligor herein is not in default, its obligation having been duly suspended pursuant to the subordination agreement executed by plaintiff, no amount is now due under the guarantee upon which plaintiff premises his right to recover. Since there is no amount now due, plaintiff has not yet been damaged, and the action was properly dismissed ( cf., Rodin Props. — Shore Mall v. Ullman, 253 A.D.2d 403). We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Sweeters v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1998
256 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Sweeters v. Hodges

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN SWEETERS, JR., Appellant, v. DANIEL R. HODGES, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
683 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

Merch. Cash & Capital LLC v. Edgewood Grp., LLC

A guarantor is liable "only for the amount of the principal obligor's default." Sweeters v. Hodges, 683…

Greenwich Capital Fin. Prods. v. Negrin

Therefore, the parties' dispute centers upon an interpretation of the terms of the Loan Agreement, as to the…