From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweet v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Jun 3, 2008
CASE NO. 4:07cv295-SPM/WCS (N.D. Fla. Jun. 3, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:07cv295-SPM/WCS.

June 3, 2008


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated May 2, 2008 (doc. 18). The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 18) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Ground two is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. The procedural default defense to ground one is denied. Respondent shall file a response on the merits of ground one on or before July 7, 2008.

4. This case is remanded to the Honorable William C. Sherrill, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for consideration of the merits of grounds one and three.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sweet v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Jun 3, 2008
CASE NO. 4:07cv295-SPM/WCS (N.D. Fla. Jun. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Sweet v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:RICKY SWEET, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Jun 3, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 4:07cv295-SPM/WCS (N.D. Fla. Jun. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Siarkiewicz v. McNeil

Therefore, petitioner cannot bring a federal habeas petition directed at the offenses in counts II, III and…

Mays v. Dinwiddie

Several cases, cited here for persuasive reasoning, have held that the rationale of Garlotte does not extend…