holding that no Fourth Amendment rights were violated when officer "did not intend the bullet to bring plaintiff within his control"
Summary of this case from Pollino v. City of PhiladelphiaNo. 91-6030.
October 7, 1992.
M.D.Pa., 769 F.Supp. 747.
AFFIRMED
holding that no Fourth Amendment rights were violated when officer "did not intend the bullet to bring plaintiff within his control"
Summary of this case from Pollino v. City of Philadelphiafinding that requested information was relevant under the NLRA, and that accordingly, "the disclosure of such information is mandated by the Privacy Act because its use is precisely for such purposes recognized by the Privacy Act — the ability of the Union to properly perform its duties as the collective bargaining representative of the unit employees"
Summary of this case from N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal ServiceFull title:Sweeney v. St. Joseph's Hosp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Oct 7, 1992
See Troublefield v. City of Harrisburg, Bureau of Police, 789 F.Supp. 160, 166 (M.D. Pa. 1992) ("Brower v.…
Clark v. BuchkoId. at 599, 109 S.Ct. at 1382. Following Brower, at least three courts have applied Brower in the context of…