From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeney v. Purcell Constr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 2005
20 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

CA 04-01307.

Decided July 1, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered April 29, 2004. The order denied defendants' motion to preclude certain evidence.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (MATTHEW D. GUMAER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

CHERUNDOLO, BOTTAR LEONE, P.C., SYRACUSE (JOHN C. CHERUNDOLO OF COUNSEL), AND COZEN O'CONNOR, NEW YORK, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Before: PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., SCUDDER, GORSKI, MARTOCHE, AND LAWTON, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot.


Summaries of

Sweeney v. Purcell Constr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 2005
20 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Sweeney v. Purcell Constr. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ZONA GALE B. SWEENEY, BERNARD B. SWEENEY, PENNY CUMMINGS, BARRY CUMMINGS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 1, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)