From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeney v. Modern Woodmen of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

May, 1923.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The 28th finding of fact contained in defendant's requests to find is disapproved and reversed because it is inconsistent with the other findings and a mistake and an irregularity in the record, due to inadvertence. In lieu thereof this court finds as follows: That Dennis Sullivan occasionally used intoxicating liquors of which the defendant had notice in the application but such use was not of the extent and nature contemplated by the conditions and warranties in the certificate, which provided that the use of alcoholic drinks should render the certificate null and void and of no effect. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 105, 584; Reich v. Cochran, 196 App. Div. 248, 254.) All concur.


Summaries of

Sweeney v. Modern Woodmen of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Sweeney v. Modern Woodmen of America

Case Details

Full title:HENRY J. SWEENEY, Respondent, v. MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1923

Citations

206 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Citing Cases

Utica Trust Deposit Co. v. Decker

This right is usually exercised when by reason of insufficient findings in the court below due to…