Sweeney v. McConnell

Full title: DAVID LEONARD SWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. MITCH McCONNELL, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 23, 2011

Case No. 3:11cv517/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11cv517/MCR/EMT

12-23-2011

DAVID LEONARD SWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. MITCH McCONNELL, et al., Defendants.

M. CASEY RODGERS

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 23, 2011. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

_____________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE