From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeney v. Doyle

California Court of Appeals, Third District
Apr 16, 1906
7 Cal. Unrep. 265 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906)

Opinion


86 P. 819 7 Cal.Unrep. 265 SWEENEY v. DOYLE. County Auditor. California Court of Appeals, Third District April 16, 1906

On rehearing. Denied.

For former opinion, see 84 P. 1017.

OPINION

McLAUGHLIN, J.

In his petition for rehearing appellant insists that section 936 of the Political Code was repealed by the provisions of the county government act subsequently enacted. This point was made in the briefs, but was not noticed in the opinion filed, and hence we deem it proper to say that there is nothing in the point then and now urged. The county government act contains no provision relating to the payment of salaries in cases where an action to determine [7 Cal.Unrep. 266] the right to an office is pending, and, as repeals by implication are not favored, the existing law relating to this particular subject was not repealed thereby.

The petition for a rehearing is denied.

We concur: CHIPMAN, P.J.; BUCKLES, J.


Summaries of

Sweeney v. Doyle

California Court of Appeals, Third District
Apr 16, 1906
7 Cal. Unrep. 265 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906)
Case details for

Sweeney v. Doyle

Case Details

Full title:SWEENEY v. DOYLE. County Auditor.

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Apr 16, 1906

Citations

7 Cal. Unrep. 265 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906)
7 Cal. Unrep. 265

Citing Cases

Showers v. Zanone

She knew and so did her agent, that the work was in progress, and the latter at least must have known that…