Sweed v. LNU

Full title: James Lee SWEED, petitioner, v. Randell LNU, et al.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 11, 2010

558 U.S. 1105 (2010)

130 S. Ct. 1064

175 L. Ed. 2d 875

78 U.S.L.W. 3394

Opinion

No. 09–7143.

2010-01-11

James Lee SWEED, petitioner, v. Randell LNU, et al.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397 and cases cited therein.