From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swearingen v. Mitchell Rudder Props., LP

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
May 30, 2012
No. 10-10-00141-CV (Tex. App. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-10-00141-CV

05-30-2012

ROBERT A. SWEARINGEN, GKG.NET, INC., PAUL MARVIN, AND TAYLOR MARVIN, Appellants v. MITCHELL RUDDER PROPERTIES, LP, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO KARBROOKE, INC., Appellee


From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06-003373-CV-85


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed an "Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal." See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). It states that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and that Appellants seek dismissal of this appeal with costs to be assessed against the party incurring them.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Dismissed [CV06]


Summaries of

Swearingen v. Mitchell Rudder Props., LP

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
May 30, 2012
No. 10-10-00141-CV (Tex. App. May. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Swearingen v. Mitchell Rudder Props., LP

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. SWEARINGEN, GKG.NET, INC., PAUL MARVIN, AND TAYLOR MARVIN…

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

No. 10-10-00141-CV (Tex. App. May. 30, 2012)