From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swartz v. Absolut Ctr. for Nursing & Rehab

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 19, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

521578.

05-19-2016

In the Matter of the Claim of Donna SWARTZ, Claimant, v. ABSOLUT CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHAB et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.

Law Offices of Melissa A. Day, PLLC, Amherst (Ellen Shanahan Becker of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Donya Fernandez of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.


Law Offices of Melissa A. Day, PLLC, Amherst (Ellen Shanahan Becker of counsel), for appellants.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Donya Fernandez of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.

Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, DEVINE, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ.

DEVINE, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 23, 2014, which ruled that claimant sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.

Immediately following the end of her shift, claimant was in the employer's parking lot and tripped on a trailer hitch on her parked car. She fell and sustained injuries to her right elbow and both hands. Claimant subsequently applied for workers' compensation benefits. The employer and its workers' compensation carrier controverted the claim, and, following a hearing, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge found that claimant sustained a work-related injury and awarded benefits. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed, and this appeal ensued. We affirm. “To be compensable under the Workers' Compensation Law, an injury must have arisen both out of and in the course of a claimant's employment” (Matter of McFarland v. Lindy's Taxi, Inc., 49 A.D.3d 1111, 1112, 853 N.Y.S.2d 743 [2008] [citations omitted]; accord Matter of Panarella v. JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp., 78 A.D.3d 1470, 1471, 911 N.Y.S.2d 502 [2010] ; see Workers' Compensation Law § 10[1] ). Moreover, “[w]hile on the employer's premises, going to or coming from work is generally considered an incident of the employment” (Sicktish v. Vulcan Indus. of Buffalo, 33 A.D.2d 975, 976, 307 N.Y.S.2d 385 [1970] ; accord Matter of Panarella v. JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp., 78 A.D.3d at 1471, 911 N.Y.S.2d 502 ; see Matter of Mercado v. Schenectady City School Dist., 24 A.D.3d 846, 847, 804 N.Y.S.2d 856 [2005] ).

Here, the record reveals that claimant tripped and fell in the employer's parking lot as she was preparing to leave at the end of her shift. Thus, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's determination that claimant's injury arose out of and in the course of her employment (see Matter of Mercado v. Schenectady City School Dist., 24 A.D.3d at 847, 804 N.Y.S.2d 856 ; Matter of Camino v. Chappaqua Transp., 19 A.D.3d 856, 856–857, 796 N.Y.S.2d 736 [2005] ; Matter of Evans v. J.W. Mays, Inc., 25 A.D.2d 597, 598, 267 N.Y.S.2d 233 [1966], lv. denied 17 N.Y.2d 423, 270 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 217 N.E.2d 40 [1966] ).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Swartz v. Absolut Ctr. for Nursing & Rehab

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 19, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Swartz v. Absolut Ctr. for Nursing & Rehab

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Donna SWARTZ, Claimant, v. ABSOLUT CENTER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 19, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 1292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
30 N.Y.S.3d 592
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3937

Citing Cases

Wallen v. Software Commc'n Sys. Inc.

--------"Initially, it is well settled that, in order for an injury to be compensable, it must arise out of…

Siegel v. Garibaldi

Defendant essentially maintains that because Campus Drive is a private road maintained by the CIA, he…