Swanson v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Henderson v. State

    320 Ga. App. 553 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 12 times
    In Henderson, we concluded that the State proved that the defendant knew the children depicted were minors because the images showed children who were clearly prepubescent.

    (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Swanson v. State, 309 Ga.App. 381, 382, 708 S.E.2d 307 (2011). See OCGA § 15–6–3(33).

  2. Edwards v. State

    350 Ga. App. 67 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)

    And even if he had, his remedy would lie in habeas corpus. See Shelton v. State , 307 Ga. App. 599, 603 (3) (b), 705 S.E.2d 699 (2011) (remedy for void indictment limited to habeas corpus when motion in arrest of judgment not filed within the same term of court in which judgment entered); Swanson v. State , 309 Ga. App. 381, 382, 708 S.E.2d 307 (2011) (motion in arrest of judgment is means to challenge indictment and must be brought within the same term of court in which the judgment was entered). 3.

  3. Poole v. State

    326 Ga. App. 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that indictment alleging the crime of terroristic threats was not fatally defective for failing to specify the "crime of violence" threatened against the victims

    Lowe v. State, 276 Ga. 538, 539(2), 579 S.E.2d 728 (2003). See Swanson v. State, 309 Ga.App. 381, 382, 708 S.E.2d 307 (2011). “A general demurrer challenges the validity of an indictment by asserting that the substance of the indictment is legally insufficient to charge any crime,” and it should be granted “only when an indictment is absolutely void in that it fails to charge the accused with any act made a crime by the law.”