From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swanson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 4, 2010
Civil File No. 09-1737 (MJD/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Civil File No. 09-1737 (MJD/JJK).

August 4, 2010

Sean M. Quinn, Falsani, Balmer, Peterson, Quinn Beyer, Counsel for Plaintiff.

Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney's Office, Counsel for Defendant.


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated May 3, 2010 [Docket No. 13]. Defendant has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 14]. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

In its objection, Defendant argues that the Magistrate Judge improperly recommended remand for award of a closed period of disability-insurance benefits for January 7, 2005 through April 30, 2008, rather than remand to the Agency for further proceedings, subject to later judicial review. The Eighth Circuit has held that "where the total record convincingly establishes disability and further hearings would merely delay receipt of benefits, an immediate order granting benefits without remand is appropriate." Cline v. Sullivan, 939 F.2d 560, 569 (8th Cir. 1991). Here, there is overwhelming evidence in the record supporting a closed period of disability for January 7, 2005 through April 30, 2008. As a result, the Court finds that remand to the Agency for further proceedings would unnecessarily delay Plaintiff's access to benefits and that a direct award of benefits is therefore warranted.

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 3, 2010 [Docket No. 13].
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 6] is GRANTED IN PART for award of a closed period of disability and DENIED IN PART for award of continuing disability benefits.
3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10] is DENIED.
4. The case is REMANDED pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for calculation and award of disability-insurance benefits for a closed period of January 7, 2005 through April 30, 2008.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY


Summaries of

Swanson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 4, 2010
Civil File No. 09-1737 (MJD/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Swanson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PEGGY SWANSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 4, 2010

Citations

Civil File No. 09-1737 (MJD/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

Samantha C. v. Kijakazi

Id.See 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(1)(A); see also Swanson v. Astrue, No. CV 09-1737 (MJD/JJK), 2010 WL 3118785, at…