From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swann v. Hinkle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
May 16, 2022
1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS (E.D. Tenn. May. 16, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS

05-16-2022

JAMES SWANN, JR. Plaintiff, v. AMY L. HINKLE, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed herewith, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner's pro se civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as frivolous, and as against Defendants who are immune. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Swann v. Hinkle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
May 16, 2022
1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS (E.D. Tenn. May. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Swann v. Hinkle

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SWANN, JR. Plaintiff, v. AMY L. HINKLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: May 16, 2022

Citations

1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS (E.D. Tenn. May. 16, 2022)