From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swann v. Hinkle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Feb 18, 2022
1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS

02-18-2022

JAMES SWANN, JR. Plaintiff, v. AMY L. HINKLE, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed herewith, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 1] is DENIED, this prisoner's pro se complaint for relief filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), Plaintiff is ASSESSED the filing fee of $402.00, and the custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit payments toward the filing fee in the manner set forth in the memorandum opinion. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of the memorandum opinion and this order to the Sheriff of Sullivan County and the Court's financial deputy.

Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Swann v. Hinkle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Feb 18, 2022
1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Swann v. Hinkle

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SWANN, JR. Plaintiff, v. AMY L. HINKLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Feb 18, 2022

Citations

1:21-CV-319-CLC-CHS (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 18, 2022)