From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swann v. Graybeal

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 3, 2021
2:21-CV-82-RLJ-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-82-RLJ-CRW

08-03-2021

BLAKE O'BRYAN SWANN, Petitioner, v. ED GRAYBEAL, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEON JORDAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, an inmate proceeding pro se in a federal habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, has filed a motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss the petition [Doc. 8]. Respondent has failed to respond to the motion, and the deadline to do so has passed. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1.

Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a petitioner to voluntarily dismiss an action without leave of court before the adverse party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1); Williams v. Caruso, No. 2:07-CV-11291, 2008 WL 544954, at *1 (M.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2008) (finding Rule 41 fully applies to federal habeas petitions). Respondent has not yet responded to the petition, and therefore, dismissal is appropriate under Rule 41(a)(1). Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for voluntary dismissal [Doc. 8] will be GRANTED, and this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT ORDER WILL ENTER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Swann v. Graybeal

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 3, 2021
2:21-CV-82-RLJ-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Swann v. Graybeal

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE O'BRYAN SWANN, Petitioner, v. ED GRAYBEAL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Aug 3, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-82-RLJ-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 3, 2021)