From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swain v. Bell

Superior Court of North Carolina Wilmington
May 1, 1802
3 N.C. 179 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Opinion

(May Term, 1802.)

1. Where there is a natural boundary called for, course will be disregarded.

2. Where there is a lappage, possession thereof for seven years, interrupted, will ripen title in the possessor.


The courses of the patent after arriving at Lockwood Folly are described thus: thence up a creek within the inlet and the westwardly branch to the head; thence northeast to Elizabeth River. Where there is a natural boundary, it must be followed; and if, as here, the next course will lead to a point whereby the land will not be included, but calls for a natural boundary, the course is to be disregarded, and the nearest course to the natural boundary must be taken. As to possession, if a smaller patent be laid on land included in a greater, and the patentee of this smaller part take possession, and that be not interrupted, though possession be taken of other parts of the larger patent, and that uninterrupted possession be continued under the smaller patent for seven years, it will give a title to the possessor.

NOTE. — As to the first point, see the cases referred to in the note to Person v. Roundtree, 1 N.C. 18; and as to the second, see the cases referred to in the note to Borretts v. Turner, ante, 113.

Cited: Cherry v. Slade, 7 N.C. 86.


Summaries of

Swain v. Bell

Superior Court of North Carolina Wilmington
May 1, 1802
3 N.C. 179 (N.C. Super. 1802)
Case details for

Swain v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:SWAIN v. BELL BELLUNE

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina Wilmington

Date published: May 1, 1802

Citations

3 N.C. 179 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Citing Cases

Allen v. Cates

This principle finds expression in the rule that a call for a natural object, permanently located will…