From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swain v. Am. Honda Fin.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 22, 2005
No. 02-05-120-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-05-120-CV

Delivered: September 22, 2005.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County.

PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On August 19, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Swain v. Am. Honda Fin.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 22, 2005
No. 02-05-120-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2005)
Case details for

Swain v. Am. Honda Fin.

Case Details

Full title:CHANDLER S. SWAIN, Appellant v. AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 22, 2005

Citations

No. 02-05-120-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2005)