From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swaim v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Apr 7, 2020
597 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107913

04-07-2020

Edward Kavanaugh SWAIM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant. Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Edward Kavanaugh Swaim, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Swaim v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Apr 7, 2020
597 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Swaim v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward Kavanaugh SWAIM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Apr 7, 2020

Citations

597 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)