From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swagerty v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2157 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2157 GGH P.

February 24, 2011


ORDER


On August 20, 2010, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #5). By order filed December 1, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twentyeight days to file a second amended complaint. In the December 1st order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the December 1, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: February 24, 2011


Summaries of

Swagerty v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2157 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Swagerty v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK SWAGERTY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2157 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)