From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swagerty v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0030 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-12-0030 EFB P

01-18-2012

MARK SWAGERTY, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's January 5, 2012 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.

_________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Swagerty v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0030 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Swagerty v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:MARK SWAGERTY, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-12-0030 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)