From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.W. v. Spring Lake Park Sch. Dist. No. 16

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 8, 2000
606 N.W.2d 61 (Minn. 2000)

Summary

declining to extend official immunity vicariously to school district because it had not assigned a duty applicable to the employees' operational acts

Summary of this case from Sletten v. Ramsey County

Opinion

No. C9-98-1912.

Dated February 8, 2000.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc, Court of Appeals.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals dated May 4, 1999, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. This disposition should not be construed as expressing either agreement or disagreement with the analysis in the court of appeals' opinion.

Dated: February 8, 2000

BY THE COURT:

/s/ PAUL H. ANDERSON Associate Justice

BLATZ, C.J., PAGE and GILBERT, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

S.W. v. Spring Lake Park Sch. Dist. No. 16

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 8, 2000
606 N.W.2d 61 (Minn. 2000)

declining to extend official immunity vicariously to school district because it had not assigned a duty applicable to the employees' operational acts

Summary of this case from Sletten v. Ramsey County
Case details for

S.W. v. Spring Lake Park Sch. Dist. No. 16

Case Details

Full title:S.W. and J.W. as parents and natural guardians of A.M.W., Respondents v…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 8, 2000

Citations

606 N.W.2d 61 (Minn. 2000)

Citing Cases

Wendt v. Cnty. of Mille Lacs

For example, in S.W. v. Spring Lake Park Sch. Dist. No. 16, this court concluded that, while official…

Sletten v. Ramsey County

1993) (granting vicarious official immunity to county because to grant immunity to a county social worker but…