Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Svela v. Bloch

294 Ill. App. 515 (Ill. App. Ct. 1938)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Svela v. Bloch

1 Citing case

  1. Fuhler v. Gohman Levine Const. Co.

    346 Mo. 588 (Mo. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In Fuhler v. Gohman Levine Constr. Co., 346 Mo. 588, 142 S.W.2d 482 (1940), the lien claimant, a subcontractor, was permitted to recover not only reasonable compensation for his labor and materials but also a percentage for profit and overhead.

    (1) Inexcusable delay, in the prosecution of the lien claims, operated, by virtue of the statute, as an extinguishment of the claims. R.S. 1929, sec. 3172; Julius Seidel Lbr. Co. v. Hydraulic Press Brick Co., 288 S.W. 981; Holt v. Miller, 6 P.2d 937, 79 A.L.R. 847; Hayward Lbr. Inv. Co. v. Greenwalt, 12 P.2d 445; Gluck v. Ruiz-Urrutia, 129 A. 130; Patterson Glass Co. v. Goldstein, 129 A. 422; Toher v. Lochinvar Realty Co., 108 N.Y.S. 667; Svela v. Bloch, 294 Ill. App. 522; Conrad v. Certified Ice Fuel Co., 276 N.W. 287. (2) Claimant George J. Fuhler is not entitled to a lien.